Publications & Research :: Brief
Using Surveys for Public Sector Reform
SURVEY DESIGN SERVICE DELIVERY INFORMATION NEEDS STATISTICS SURVEY DATA SURVEY METHODOLOGY PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT PRIMARY EDUCATION PRIMARY HEALTH CARE PUBLIC POLICY TAX ADMINISTRATION QUANTITATIVE DATA MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISES CORRUPTION ACCOUNTING ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS AGRICULTURE AUDITS AUTHORITY BENCHMARKS CLINICS CORRUPTION DISTRICTS DRUGS ECONOMICS EVASION GOVERNMENT LEVEL GOVERNMENT POLICY HEALTH CARE HEALTH SERVICES HYGIENE INTERVENTION LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENTS MEDICAL SUPPLIES PARENTS PRESCRIPTIONS PRESIDENCY PRIVATE SECTOR PROCUREMENT PROVISIONS PUBLIC EXPENDITURE PUBLIC FUNDS PUBLIC HEALTH PUBLIC SECTOR PUBLIC SECTOR REFORM PUBLIC SPENDING QUALITATIVE RESEARCH QUANTITATIVE DATA RADIO SCHOOLS SERVICE DELIVERY SOCIAL RESEARCH TAX TAX ADMINISTRATION TAX EXEMPTIONS TAX POLICY TAX SYSTEM TAXATION TRANSPARENCY
Attachments [ 0 ]
More Details
World Bank, Washington, DC
Africa | Uganda
2012-08-13T15:11:25Z | 2012-08-13T15:11:25Z | 1999-05
Diagnostic surveys can provide vital information for decisionmakers when institutional weaknesses inhibit a more regular flow of information. If strategically designed, a survey can help induce policy change by pointing directly to the main bottlenecks, making it easier for policymakers to find solutions. This note summarizes two cases in Uganda where diagnostic surveys proved particularly useful. The first case involves public spending on health and education; the second considers tax administration from the perspective of taxpaying firms.
Comments
(Leave your comments here about this item.)